On Tue 19 Jul 2016 at 13:43:08 -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 02:51:02AM -0700 I heard the voice of
> Greg A. Woods, and lo! it spake thus:
> > I don't like GNU Autotools so much, but it's a billion times better
> > than CMake,
> 
> >From the dev side, I contest the crap out of that.  Making an
> autotools setup that does what we're doing with cmake would be a lot
> of work, and I'd put a heavy burden of proof (including certification
> of mental stability) on anybody claiming the result would be
> fractionally as manageable.

For another project which had an old-fashioned configuration system (it
consisted of choosing the correct system directory with the right
makefile in it). I wanted to have something that did some system
introspection but not the full GNU autotools since that is a bit too
much complexity for what I had in mind. So it turned out to be possible
to just use autoconf and avoid automake. It helped that there was
already a good base Makefile where configuring it could easily be done
by setting a bunch of variables. So I simply generate some prefix to the
(mostly) the original Makefile with the right substitutions.

See https://github.com/Rhialto/klh10/blob/master/configure.ac if you
like.

-Olaf.
-- 
___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert  -- Wayland: Those who don't understand X
\X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl    -- are condemned to reinvent it. Poorly.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to