hi, I would go with CMake and autoconf. Both cover all possible platforms.
Cheers, On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Daniel Stenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Piotr Dobrogost wrote: > >> Having this CMake build scripts doesn't prevent having the hand written >> nmake makefiles as well. This would allow to build curl without using CMake >> for those who doesn't want to use it. In the future we could add boost.build >> scripts so that people used to this build system could build this way. > > I think we shouldn't have to add support for every imaginable build system > just because they exist. They all require maintenance (and we already have > problem to maintain the non-configure builds) and we risk "drowning" in > options. > > Or would boost.build add anything in particular that cmake won't? (I've not > used either one.) > > -- > > / daniel.haxx.se > -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
