skrll@ wrote: > > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2014/07/21/msg025327.html > > >>> We probably don't have the ressources for providing binaries > >>> for each {,e}arm{,hf} variants. > "Probably"? > > Anyway, I don't think anyone is asking for all variants.
Well, I asked to releng/core, and one of releng member answered it. That's all. > > My first question is > > > > "Which MACHINE_ARCH should be used for each arm port on the next release" > > > > It's non-technical, but probably determined by marketing and resources. > > What's wrong with my suggestion? Feel free to suggest improvements. You just mentioned possible combinations. For binary builders, "complete MACHINE:MACHINE_ARCH list" is necessary and enough, I think. > > Ramdom comments won't help to get a proper conclusion, I'm afraid. > > Is that aimed at me or you? > > Anyway, I'm trying to get to an answer through discussion. Something I > think you're keen to see. The branch date is July 26h per the announcemnet. I think we should be "keen" for the deadline. --- Izumi Tsutsui
