rjs@ wrote: > Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > >skrll@ wrote: > >> I'd guess > >> > >> MACHINE=hpcarm MACHINE_ARCH=earmv4 > >> > >> Maybe the port-masters/users can test? > > I can test hpcarm on an iPAQ.
Ok, good to hear. > >Unfortunately all these ports are orphaned. > > There were updates to hpcarm recently to get it to work on WZERO3 > hardware, what is needed for it not to be considered orphaned ? "orphaned" means there is no portmainter to make a decision. http://www.netbsd.org/people/port-maintainers.html I have W-ZERO3 and Zaurus machines, but I'm not so motivated because I'm not sure what's the actual benefits and risk/concerns on switching to earm on such XScale generation machines. (most important part is lack of migration method, of course) Is there any documents/articles that describe earm on NetBSD? If not, we won't have enough brave users. --- Izumi Tsutsui
