> AFAICT the important fact is that the route to 114.23.164.222 has lo0 in the > Interface column meaning (according to the manual page) that lo0 will be > used to reach that IP address. In your case, wg0 will be used, which means > the packet will be transmitted over WireGuard to the remote end. This > doesn't do what you want.
Is it even possible to do that in NetBSD? I've been toying around with route(8) for a while, and all my attempts to coax it into inserting a route to an interface in a different subnet than the gateway's so far have failed. > I expect that you will need to dig deeper into WireGuard. It's quite > possible that this is a bug in WireGuard. Or you might just have something > misconfigured. I don't know anything about WireGuard and only a little bit > about PPPoE. Oh, I probably should have shared my config to begin with, my bad- here goes: #!/bin/sh ifconfig wg0 create 10.0.0.1/8 wgconfig wg0 set private-key /etc/wg/wg0.key wgconfig wg0 set listen-port <port> wgconfig wg0 add peer <hostname> <key> --allowed-ips=10.0.0.2/32 [...] ifconfig wg0 up
