On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:46:34AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > Am I wrong in assuming that any automatically-built packages would > have BATCH and/or PACKAGE_BUILDING defined at build time, and that
That's an "and". http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ports/Tools/portbuild/scripts/buildenv?rev=1.29;content-type=text%2Fplain Cheers, -erwin > the code in bsd.port(.pre).mk would use the default value for all > options in that case? Or is there some defined symbol - or some other > combination of symbols - that would result in WITH_HIDE_SYMBOLS > *not* being defined, even though the option's default is "yes"? > > Of course, I could be missing something, in which case I'd be thankful > for a correction in my worldview :) > > G'luck, > Peter > > -- > Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@space.bg r...@freebsd.org > PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc > Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 > If there were no counterfactuals, this sentence would not have been > paradoxical. -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Prediction is very difficult especially about the future er...@freebsd.org
pgpbyV93eTPqa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
