On 07 August 2004 16:46, Sven Panne wrote:

> Not really, but there are no deep technical reasons for this, just a
> lack of 
> time. First of all we should agree on the required target formats,
> which should 
> be dvi, ps, pdf, and html IMHO. The next thing are the supported
> DocBook XML toolchains, there are quite a few of them:
> 
>     1) (open)jade-based ones:
> 
>        a) Eric Bischoff's docbook2{dvi,ps,pdf,html} tools
> 
>        b) The DocBook toys db2{dvi,ps,pdf,html}
> 
>     2) XSLT-based ones:
> 
>        a) xmlto, a wrapper around xsltproc
> 
>        b) pure xsltproc / saxon / xalan
> 
>     3) XSLT/FO-based ones (needs some support from 2), too):
> 
>        a) PassiveTeX
> 
> There are of course a lot more tools out there, but not all can
> generate all needed formats or are heavily specialized (like
> meinproc). Option 2b) is too fragile IMHO, because one would have to
> specify a lot of paths, options etc., which will be too tricky to get
> working reliably. Option 3a) doesn't really offer an improvement over
> the rest, only an additional tool is required for building, so it's
> not really the way to go currently. 
> 
> So I propose the following: Let autoconf find out which toolchain is
> supported (docbook2foo, db2foo, or xmlto) and make our conversion
> scripts a simple wrapper around it, no need for the current CATALOG
> fiddling at all. The SGML docs are almost XML already, so let's
> change this, too, and nuke all SGML support from fptools.

Sounds fine to me, as long as we still have wide enough tool support
i.e. currently most Linux and *BSD distributions have a working SGML
toolchain either out-of-the-box or by installing a port, I don't want to
go back to a situation where installing the doc tools is a challenge in
itself.

Also - we currently have the ability to fiddle with the stylesheet
settings ourselves.  Would we lose that?

> If nobody yells, I'll make the necessary changes for the HEAD. But
> first I'll have to finish Doom 3, of course...  >:-)

Glad to see you've still got your priorities straight ;-)

Cheers,
        Simon
_______________________________________________
Cvs-fptools mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-fptools

Reply via email to