On 09 August 2004 16:52, Sven Panne wrote: > So I think the most conservative path would be to maintain our > current route via (open)jade, only changing/improving the scripts > around it a bit.
Sounds fine... Simon _______________________________________________ Cvs-fptools mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-fptools
