Hi

> This does mean that any patches to the main haddock repo need to pass
> validate.

I contribute patches to Haddock, but have no way to run validate (I
don't have my own computer currently, and can't install mingw/cygwin
on any of the machines I have access to). What should I do? I doubt
the patches I supply will break validate, as they all concern the
Hoogle back end, but I have no real way of knowing that without
actually running validate.

Perhaps one solution would be to pull from haddock only up until the
most recent tag (if darcs supports a feature). Then everyone can work
on the main haddock repo, and "push" the changes into GHC by simply
tagging, after validation.

Thanks

Neil

_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc

Reply via email to