On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 07:39:08PM +0200, David Waern wrote: > 2008/8/29 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > I have a GHC tree that builds and uses haddock 6.10 during the build > > process, and validates. > > > > David, as I understand it you want to avoid having a separate haddock > > repo for GHC, right? > > Yes, but I don't like the thought of having to validate GHC every time > I push something. I think Neil's suggestion sounds good. With a > separate branch, it's too easy for GHC developers too push something > that's not compatible with earlier GHCs.
Hmm, I'm not sure it will affect what is pushed. After all, if we do it in the same way as we've done Cabal, then people are supposed to push to both repos at the same time. Anyway, I've made a repo in darcs.haskell.org for now, so we don't have to worry about unvalidated changes in the main haddock repo. Like I said, we'll need to change how it works in a couple of weeks anyway, after the git move, so we can decide what the long-term plan is then. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
