Hi Tim Sounds a great idea. My only question is the name for the library - ext-core in the GHC tree means implicitly GHC, and the library name means external core. On hackage ghc-core would implicitly mean external, and the name means GHC Core. Just a thought, and doesn't matter too much - I'd use it even if it was called evil-core :-)
Thanks Neil On 9/12/08, Tim Chevalier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it would probably be a good idea to move the External Core > library out of the GHC tree and onto Hackage (or something), since it > isn't needed to build GHC, and it was presumably only there in the > first place because Hackage didn't exist at the time. (And > admittedly, mostly because I don't want to make sure I have a GHC tree > that I can actually push patches from every time I want to check > something in under utils/ext-core.) > > Any objections? > > Cheers, > Tim > > > -- > Tim Chevalier * http://cs.pdx.edu/~tjc * Often in error, never in doubt > Just enough: Obama/Biden '08. > > _______________________________________________ > Cvs-ghc mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc > _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
