No objections from me. Sounds like a good idea. Simon
| -----Original Message----- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim | Chevalier | Sent: 12 September 2008 03:03 | To: [email protected] | Subject: Splitting off ext-core library? | | I think it would probably be a good idea to move the External Core | library out of the GHC tree and onto Hackage (or something), since it | isn't needed to build GHC, and it was presumably only there in the | first place because Hackage didn't exist at the time. (And | admittedly, mostly because I don't want to make sure I have a GHC tree | that I can actually push patches from every time I want to check | something in under utils/ext-core.) | | Any objections? | | Cheers, | Tim | | -- | Tim Chevalier * http://cs.pdx.edu/~tjc * Often in error, never in doubt | Just enough: Obama/Biden '08. | | _______________________________________________ | Cvs-ghc mailing list | [email protected] | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
