My validate always has process008 failing (missing printf). The rest is fine.
2008/12/10 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Simon Marlow wrote: >> >> Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: >>> >>> | Hooray for the testsuite and validate: out of 2000+ tests, there was >>> | exactly 1 (ONE) that demonstrated this bug, and it was in a test for >>> the >>> | System.Random library of all things. This serves as a reminder to all >>> of >>> | us: any test failure should be treated as suspicious, even if it >>> doesn't >>> | look at all related to something you changed, and this is exactly why >>> we >>> | have to keep validate clean. I am now a fully paid-up validate >>> convert! >>> >>> Indeed! >>> >>> On Windows (MSYS) I get several failures that I'm pretty sure have been >>> there for a while. They seem to relate to things like 'printf' not >>> existing. That makes it harder to interpret a Windows validate run. >>> >>> I wonder if someone (Neil? Ian?) might investigate? >> >> I see some, but not all of those failures on our buildbots, I'll >> investigate. We had zero failures a few days ago, so I think these are new. > > Well, on closer inspection we currently have zero failures on the Cygwin > buildbots, for the fast/validate testsuite. I don't have an MSYS build set > up, so could someone else try with that? > > Cheers, > Simon > > _______________________________________________ > Cvs-ghc mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc > -- Push the envelope. Watch it bend. _______________________________________________ Cvs-ghc mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
