User: jpmcc Date: 2008-04-04 05:00:47+0000 Modified: native-lang/www/planet/atom.xml native-lang/www/planet/index.html native-lang/www/planet/opml.xml native-lang/www/planet/rss10.xml native-lang/www/planet/rss20.xml
Log: Planet run at Fri Apr 4 06:00:35 BST 2008 File Changes: Directory: /native-lang/www/planet/ =================================== File [changed]: atom.xml Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/atom.xml?r1=1.80&r2=1.81 Delta lines: +58 -23 --------------------- --- atom.xml 2008-04-03 23:00:52+0000 1.80 +++ atom.xml 2008-04-04 05:00:45+0000 1.81 @@ -5,9 +5,66 @@ <link rel="self" href="http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml"/> <link href="http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/"/> <id>http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/atom.xml</id> - <updated>2008-04-03T23:00:47+00:00</updated> + <updated>2008-04-04T05:00:39+00:00</updated> <generator uri="http://www.planetplanet.org/";>Planet/2.0 +http://www.planetplanet.org</generator> + <entry xml:lang="utf-8"> + <title type="html">Not Yet, not yet :)</title> + <link href="http://openoffice.exblog.jp/6972122/"/> + <id>http://openoffice.exblog.jp/6972122/</id> + <updated>2008-04-04T03:26:05+00:00</updated> + <content type="html">Wait at least two months.<br /> +<br /> +http://blogs.computerworld.com/microsoft_loses_on_ooxml<br /> +<br /> +"There is a two-month period for appeals before the ISO pronounces OOXML a standard"<br /> +<br /> +ODF is ISO/IEC 26300:2006, Status: Published, Stage: 60.60 (2006-11-30).<br /> +<br /> +http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43485<br /> +<br /> +OOXML is ISO/IEC DIS 29500, Status: Under development, Stage: 40.99 (2008-04-02).<br /> +<br /> +http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=45515<br /> +<br /> +What is "Stage: 40.99"?<br /> +<br /> +It's "Full report circulated: DIS approved for registration as FDIS."<br /> +<br /> +What is "FDIS"? I don't know. Please tell me :)<br /> +<br /> +http://www.iso.org/iso/standards_development/processes_and_procedures/stages_description/stages_table.htm#s40<br /> +<br /> +As you see, to reach "60.60 International Standard published," there will be:<br /> +50 Approval stage<br /> +50.00 FDIS registered for formal approval<br /> +50.20 FDIS ballot initiated: 2 months. Proof sent to secretariat<br /> +50.60 Close of voting. Proof returned by secretariat<br /> +50.92 FDIS referred back to TC or SC<br /> +50.98 Project deleted<br /> +50.99 FDIS approved for publication<br /> +60 Publication stage<br /> +60.00 International Standard under publication<br /> +60.60 International Standard published<br /> +<br /> +And after publication, we still have:<br /> +90 Review stage, and<br /> +95 Withdrawal stage.<br /> +:)<br /> +Not yet, not yet.<br /></content> + <author> + <name>khparametric</name> + <uri>http://openoffice.exblog.jp</uri> + </author> + <source> + <title type="html">Hirano, Kazunari</title> + <subtitle type="html">Hirano, Kazunari</subtitle> + <link rel="self" href="http://openoffice.exblog.jp/atom.xml"/> + <id>http://openoffice.exblog.jp/atom.xml</id> + <updated>2008-04-04T05:00:39+00:00</updated> + </source> + </entry> + <entry> <title type="html">Guess what, there will be another round !</title> <link href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2008/04/guess-what-there-will-be-another-round.html"/> @@ -512,26 +569,4 @@ </source> </entry> - <entry> - <title type="html">Bo Vesterdorf has been asked to help</title> - <link href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2008/03/bo-vesterdorf-has-been-asked-to-help.html"/> - <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-3285149728050152305</id> - <updated>2008-03-25T14:46:58+00:00</updated> - <content type="html">Will Bo Vesterdorf be a part of the Danish decision or is it just a political maneuvre to get the miniter do what he is asked ? - -Perhaps you don't know him. Perhaps you do. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_14/b3877041.htm - -Last year he was the leading judge in the case against Microsoft in the European Court. He was one of the key figures behind the historical judgement in the case</content> - <author> - <name>Leif Lodahl</name> - <uri>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/</uri> - </author> - <source> - <title type="html">Lodahl's blog</title> - <link rel="self" href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default"/> - <id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169</id> - <updated>2008-04-02T23:01:03+00:00</updated> - </source> - </entry> - </feed> File [changed]: index.html Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/index.html?r1=1.80&r2=1.81 Delta lines: +54 -19 --------------------- --- index.html 2008-04-03 23:00:52+0000 1.80 +++ index.html 2008-04-04 05:00:45+0000 1.81 @@ -28,8 +28,61 @@ <a href="rss20.xml"><img src="rss2.gif" alt="Link to RSS 2 feed" /></a> </div> -<p><em>Bloggings on native language topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: April 03, 2008 11:00 PM GMT</em></p> +<p><em>Bloggings on native language topics by project members - see <a href="#disclaimer">disclaimer</a>.<br />Last updated: April 04, 2008 05:00 AM GMT</em></p> +<h2>April 04, 2008</h2> +<h3> +<a href="http://openoffice.exblog.jp"; title="Hirano, Kazunari"> +Kazunari Hirano</a> : +<a href="http://openoffice.exblog.jp/6972122/";> +Not Yet, not yet :)</a> +</h3> +<p> +Wait at least two months.<br /> +<br /> +http://blogs.computerworld.com/microsoft_loses_on_ooxml<br /> +<br /> +"There is a two-month period for appeals before the ISO pronounces OOXML a standard"<br /> +<br /> +ODF is ISO/IEC 26300:2006, Status: Published, Stage: 60.60 (2006-11-30).<br /> +<br /> +http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43485<br /> +<br /> +OOXML is ISO/IEC DIS 29500, Status: Under development, Stage: 40.99 (2008-04-02).<br /> +<br /> +http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=45515<br /> +<br /> +What is "Stage: 40.99"?<br /> +<br /> +It's "Full report circulated: DIS approved for registration as FDIS."<br /> +<br /> +What is "FDIS"? I don't know. Please tell me :)<br /> +<br /> +http://www.iso.org/iso/standards_development/processes_and_procedures/stages_description/stages_table.htm#s40<br /> +<br /> +As you see, to reach "60.60 International Standard published," there will be:<br /> +50 Approval stage<br /> +50.00 FDIS registered for formal approval<br /> +50.20 FDIS ballot initiated: 2 months. Proof sent to secretariat<br /> +50.60 Close of voting. Proof returned by secretariat<br /> +50.92 FDIS referred back to TC or SC<br /> +50.98 Project deleted<br /> +50.99 FDIS approved for publication<br /> +60 Publication stage<br /> +60.00 International Standard under publication<br /> +60.60 International Standard published<br /> +<br /> +And after publication, we still have:<br /> +90 Review stage, and<br /> +95 Withdrawal stage.<br /> +:)<br /> +Not yet, not yet.<br /></p> +<p> +<em><a href="http://openoffice.exblog.jp/6972122/";>by khparametric at April 04, 2008 03:26 AM GMT</a></em> +</p> +<br /> +<hr /> +<br /> <h2>April 02, 2008</h2> <h3> <a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/"; title="Lodahl's blog"> @@ -461,24 +514,6 @@ <br /> <hr /> <br /> -<h3> -<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/"; title="Lodahl's blog"> -Leif Lodahl</a> : -<a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2008/03/bo-vesterdorf-has-been-asked-to-help.html";> -Bo Vesterdorf has been asked to help</a> -</h3> -<p> -Will Bo Vesterdorf be a part of the Danish decision or is it just a political maneuvre to get the miniter do what he is asked ? - -Perhaps you don't know him. Perhaps you do. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_14/b3877041.htm - -Last year he was the leading judge in the case against Microsoft in the European Court. He was one of the key figures behind the historical judgement in the case</p> -<p> -<em><a href="http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2008/03/bo-vesterdorf-has-been-asked-to-help.html";>by Leif Lodahl at March 25, 2008 02:46 PM GMT</a></em> -</p> -<br /> -<hr /> -<br /> <a id="disclaimer" name="disclaimer"></a> <p><em>Disclaimer: all views expressed on this page are those of the individual contributors, and may not reflect the views of the File [changed]: opml.xml Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/opml.xml?r1=1.80&r2=1.81 Delta lines: +1 -1 ------------------- --- opml.xml 2008-04-03 23:00:52+0000 1.80 +++ opml.xml 2008-04-04 05:00:45+0000 1.81 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ <opml version="1.1"> <head> <title>Native Language Confederation Planet</title> - <dateModified>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:00:47 +0000</dateModified> + <dateModified>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 05:00:39 +0000</dateModified> <ownerName>Native Language Confederation</ownerName> <ownerEmail>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</ownerEmail> </head> File [changed]: rss10.xml Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/rss10.xml?r1=1.19&r2=1.20 Delta lines: +46 -12 --------------------- --- rss10.xml 2008-04-03 17:29:24+0000 1.19 +++ rss10.xml 2008-04-04 05:00:45+0000 1.20 @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ <items> <rdf:Seq> + <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://openoffice.exblog.jp/6972122/"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-530610150389021743" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-6478615014605469665" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-8658280261668164350" /> @@ -32,11 +33,55 @@ <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2008/03/26/26-march-2008-the-worlds-first-document-freedom-day/"; /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-1258696479771851999" /> <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://andreasmaooo.blogger.de/stories/1082887/"; /> - <rdf:li rdf:resource="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-3285149728050152305" /> </rdf:Seq> </items> </channel> +<item rdf:about="http://openoffice.exblog.jp/6972122/";> + <title>Kazunari Hirano: Not Yet, not yet :)</title> + <link>http://openoffice.exblog.jp/6972122/</link> + <content:encoded>Wait at least two months.<br /> +<br /> +http://blogs.computerworld.com/microsoft_loses_on_ooxml<br /> +<br /> +"There is a two-month period for appeals before the ISO pronounces OOXML a standard"<br /> +<br /> +ODF is ISO/IEC 26300:2006, Status: Published, Stage: 60.60 (2006-11-30).<br /> +<br /> +http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43485<br /> +<br /> +OOXML is ISO/IEC DIS 29500, Status: Under development, Stage: 40.99 (2008-04-02).<br /> +<br /> +http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=45515<br /> +<br /> +What is "Stage: 40.99"?<br /> +<br /> +It's "Full report circulated: DIS approved for registration as FDIS."<br /> +<br /> +What is "FDIS"? I don't know. Please tell me :)<br /> +<br /> +http://www.iso.org/iso/standards_development/processes_and_procedures/stages_description/stages_table.htm#s40<br /> +<br /> +As you see, to reach "60.60 International Standard published," there will be:<br /> +50 Approval stage<br /> +50.00 FDIS registered for formal approval<br /> +50.20 FDIS ballot initiated: 2 months. Proof sent to secretariat<br /> +50.60 Close of voting. Proof returned by secretariat<br /> +50.92 FDIS referred back to TC or SC<br /> +50.98 Project deleted<br /> +50.99 FDIS approved for publication<br /> +60 Publication stage<br /> +60.00 International Standard under publication<br /> +60.60 International Standard published<br /> +<br /> +And after publication, we still have:<br /> +90 Review stage, and<br /> +95 Withdrawal stage.<br /> +:)<br /> +Not yet, not yet.<br /></content:encoded> + <dc:date>2008-04-04T03:26:05+00:00</dc:date> + <dc:creator>khparametric</dc:creator> +</item> <item rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-530610150389021743"> <title>Leif Lodahl: Guess what, there will be another round !</title> <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2008/04/guess-what-there-will-be-another-round.html</link> @@ -322,16 +367,5 @@ In den letzten zwei Wochen habe ich mehrere Versuche mit weiteren Releasekandidaten unternommen, aber...</content:encoded> <dc:date>2008-03-25T21:02:43+00:00</dc:date> </item> -<item rdf:about="tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-3285149728050152305"> - <title>Leif Lodahl: Bo Vesterdorf has been asked to help</title> - <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2008/03/bo-vesterdorf-has-been-asked-to-help.html</link> - <content:encoded>Will Bo Vesterdorf be a part of the Danish decision or is it just a political maneuvre to get the miniter do what he is asked ? - -Perhaps you don't know him. Perhaps you do. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_14/b3877041.htm - -Last year he was the leading judge in the case against Microsoft in the European Court. He was one of the key figures behind the historical judgement in the case</content:encoded> - <dc:date>2008-03-25T14:46:58+00:00</dc:date> - <dc:creator>Leif Lodahl</dc:creator> -</item> </rdf:RDF> File [changed]: rss20.xml Url: http://native-lang.openoffice.org/source/browse/native-lang/www/planet/rss20.xml?r1=1.19&r2=1.20 Delta lines: +45 -11 --------------------- --- rss20.xml 2008-04-03 17:29:24+0000 1.19 +++ rss20.xml 2008-04-04 05:00:45+0000 1.20 @@ -8,6 +8,51 @@ <description>Native Language Confederation Planet - http://native-lang.openoffice.org/planet/</description> <item> + <title>Kazunari Hirano: Not Yet, not yet :)</title> + <guid>http://openoffice.exblog.jp/6972122/</guid> + <link>http://openoffice.exblog.jp/6972122/</link> + <description>Wait at least two months.<br /> +<br /> +http://blogs.computerworld.com/microsoft_loses_on_ooxml<br /> +<br /> +"There is a two-month period for appeals before the ISO pronounces OOXML a standard"<br /> +<br /> +ODF is ISO/IEC 26300:2006, Status: Published, Stage: 60.60 (2006-11-30).<br /> +<br /> +http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43485<br /> +<br /> +OOXML is ISO/IEC DIS 29500, Status: Under development, Stage: 40.99 (2008-04-02).<br /> +<br /> +http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=45515<br /> +<br /> +What is "Stage: 40.99"?<br /> +<br /> +It's "Full report circulated: DIS approved for registration as FDIS."<br /> +<br /> +What is "FDIS"? I don't know. Please tell me :)<br /> +<br /> +http://www.iso.org/iso/standards_development/processes_and_procedures/stages_description/stages_table.htm#s40<br /> +<br /> +As you see, to reach "60.60 International Standard published," there will be:<br /> +50 Approval stage<br /> +50.00 FDIS registered for formal approval<br /> +50.20 FDIS ballot initiated: 2 months. Proof sent to secretariat<br /> +50.60 Close of voting. Proof returned by secretariat<br /> +50.92 FDIS referred back to TC or SC<br /> +50.98 Project deleted<br /> +50.99 FDIS approved for publication<br /> +60 Publication stage<br /> +60.00 International Standard under publication<br /> +60.60 International Standard published<br /> +<br /> +And after publication, we still have:<br /> +90 Review stage, and<br /> +95 Withdrawal stage.<br /> +:)<br /> +Not yet, not yet.<br /></description> + <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:26:05 +0000</pubDate> +</item> +<item> <title>Leif Lodahl: Guess what, there will be another round !</title> <guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-530610150389021743</guid> <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2008/04/guess-what-there-will-be-another-round.html</link> @@ -297,17 +342,6 @@ In den letzten zwei Wochen habe ich mehrere Versuche mit weiteren Releasekandidaten unternommen, aber...</description> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:02:43 +0000</pubDate> </item> -<item> - <title>Leif Lodahl: Bo Vesterdorf has been asked to help</title> - <guid>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5198340507565233169.post-3285149728050152305</guid> - <link>http://lodahl.blogspot.com/2008/03/bo-vesterdorf-has-been-asked-to-help.html</link> - <description>Will Bo Vesterdorf be a part of the Danish decision or is it just a political maneuvre to get the miniter do what he is asked ? - -Perhaps you don't know him. Perhaps you do. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_14/b3877041.htm - -Last year he was the leading judge in the case against Microsoft in the European Court. He was one of the key figures behind the historical judgement in the case</description> - <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:46:58 +0000</pubDate> -</item> </channel> </rss> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
