Arthur Barrett wrote: > > I've threatened for years to write a 'C' layer on top of the existing > API (meaning a laywe without the need for pointers to functions and > structures), and I've only avoided it because noone was really showing > any interest in using the API. If I wasn't so busy right now with EVS > (and Suite and CVSNT) I'd spend a couple of days on it right now so that > Bo has something to work with. > It's a lot more than a couple of days work.. most of the API is C++ and has all sorts of dependencies.
You would be better off with a COM API which would work with anything, at least on Win32. I tried to get swig (www.swig.org) to work but it doesn't support enough of C++ to use our headers unmodified (that was some months ago though, and I tried it on evs which is a much more complex API). Tony _______________________________________________ cvsnt mailing list cvsnt@cvsnt.org http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvsnt Upgrade to CVS Suite for more features and support: http://march-hare.com/cvsnt/