On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Benson Margulies wrote: > I'm not sure that the flat thing is all that hard. I'd like to know > what the other Dan thinks.
For Arrays internal to other objects, it's not that hard. For arrays that are parameters to the SEI methods it's quite a bit harder. That said, I had the same problem in JAXB (when not using generated doc/lit/wrapped wrapper objects) so I've battled it before. (although, since the entire Aegis code is in our control, it's probably much easier) Basically, the reasons I went with the wrapper types as part of the fix for CXF-1116 was that: 1) It was consistent with the arrays internal to the other objects 2) It HAS to be implemented that way for the rpc/lit case and 3) It was easy to implement for the wrapped doc/lit case since the call path in this case is almost exactly the same as the rpc/lit case. FYI: arrays to SEI methods using RPC/Lit will generate ArrayOf types with JAXB as well. To get JAXB to NOT do the "ArrayOf" things for doc/lit/wrapped took a lot of work and separate call paths for the doc/lit/wrapped case compared to the doc/lit/bare and rpc/lit cases. Dan > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 1:25 PM > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: Kaleb Walton > > Subject: Re: Aegis databinding and Java 5 Generic List creating > > extra "anyType" field > > > > > This is *quite* undesirable. Does anyone have any suggestions for > > > a workaround? > > > > At this point, I think the only options are: > > > > 1) Switch to jaxb (which doesn't do this) > > > > 2) Start writing the code to do the "flat" stuff. Patches are > > more > > > than welcome. :-) > > > > Dan > > > > On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Kaleb Walton wrote: > > > Darn! I think that's it... I'm looking at the output of all of my > > > arrays and they fork in this extra level which is given the name > > > of the class of the object type stored in the array. > > > > > > Example: > > > Note the extra 'ServiceFieldError' level that shouldn't be there > > > and also note the 'fieldErrors' property that should actually be > > > of type Array. > > > > > > [fieldErrors] => stdClass Object > > > ( > > > [ServiceFieldError] => Array > > > ( > > > [0] => stdClass Object > > > ( > > > [code] => > > errors.required > > > > [defaultMessage] => > > Field > > > > is required > > > [field] => foo > > > [rejectedValue] => Foo > > > ) > > > > > > [1] => stdClass Object > > > ( > > > [code] => > > errors.required > > > > [defaultMessage] => > > Field > > > > is required > > > [field] => bar > > > [rejectedValue] => 1 > > > ) > > > > > > ) > > > > > > ) > > > > > > This is *quite* undesirable. Does anyone have any suggestions for > > > a workaround? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Kaleb > > > > > > |------------> > > > | From: | > > > |------------> > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >------------| > > > > > > > |"Benson Margulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >------------| > > > | > > > |------------> > > > | To: | > > > |------------> > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >------------| > > > > > > > |<cxf-user@incubator.apache.org> > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >------------| > > > | > > > |------------> > > > | Date: | > > > |------------> > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >------------| > > > > > > > |11/06/2007 11:49 AM > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >------------| > > > | > > > |------------> > > > | Subject: | > > > |------------> > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >------------| > > > > > > > |RE: Aegis databinding and Java 5 Generic List creating extra > > > | "anyType" field > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >------------| > > > > > > The 'flat' feature is an attribute in the mapping schema that was > > > intended to control some cases of either adding an extra level of > > > type/element or not. Apparently, it isn't this one. While the code > > to > > > > parse the attribute exists, the code to actually pay attention to > > > it does not. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: Kaleb Walton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 11:27 AM > > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org > > > Subject: RE: Aegis databinding and Java 5 Generic List creating > > extra > > > > "anyType" field > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately nillable is already set to > > false. > > > > What is the 'flat' feature? I can't imagine that I'm the only > > > person having the problem. > > > > > > Do you know if there is a way to specify something in an aegis.xml > > > config that tells the 'items' list to not add the 'anyType' > > property? > > > > Regards, > > > Kaleb > > > > > > Inactive hide details for "Benson Margulies" ---11/06/2007 > > > 08:58:14 AM---If you set nillable to false it might do what you > > > want"Benson Margulies" ---11/06/2007 08:58:14 AM---If you set > > > nillable to false > > it > > > > might do what you want. On the other > > > > > > > > > From: > > > > > > > > > "Benson Margulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > To: > > > > > > > > > <cxf-user@incubator.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > Date: > > > > > > > > > 11/06/2007 08:58 AM > > > > > > > > > Subject: > > > > > > > > > RE: Aegis databinding and Java 5 Generic List creating extra > > "anyType" > > > > field > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you set nillable to false it might do what you want. On the > > > other hand, it might be that this is the never-implemented 'flat' > > > feature > > of > > > > Aegis. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Kaleb Walton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 8:55 AM > > > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org > > > > Subject: Aegis databinding and Java 5 Generic List creating > > > > extra "anyType" field > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to Aegis databinding I can specify the minOccurs on my > > > > > > primitive > > > > > > > fields so the WSDL contract doesn't force them to be required. > > > > > > However, > > > > > > > Aegis has introduced something else that I'm not familiar with. > > > > It may > > > > > > be > > > > > > > "proper" but I'm not familiar with it and it seems to add one > > > > more > > > > > > level > > > > > > > of > > > > a property between a field name and it's value. > > > > > > > > I have an object defined as such: > > > > > > > > class ServiceListResult<T> { > > > > private List<T> items; > > > > //getters/setters > > > > } > > > > > > > > T is a Java 5 generic class reference. > > > > > > > > When using the Simple Server default data binding my object > > > > looked > > > > > > like > > > > > > > this when output from PHP: > > > > > > > > [items] => Array > > > > ( > > > > [0] => stdClass Object > > > > ( > > > > ... > > > > ) > > > > ) > > > > > > > > Now it looks like this: > > > > > > > > [items] => sdtClass Object > > > > ( > > > > [anyType] => Array > > > > ( > > > > [0] => stdClass Object > > > > ( > > > > ... > > > > ) > > > > ) > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any way to make the output look like the Simple Server > > did > > > > > or > > > > > > is > > > > > > > this the "proper" output since I'm using generics? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Kaleb > > > > -- > > J. Daniel Kulp > > Principal Engineer > > IONA > > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
