Thank you for laying it out plainly! I've found another reason why Aegis
doesn't work for our circumstances so I'm going to go back to jaxb to see
if theres something that will solve my minOccurs="1" on primitives issue :)
Regards,
Kaleb
From: Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Kaleb Walton/Southfield/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 11/07/2007 01:25 PM
Subject: Re: Aegis databinding and Java 5 Generic List creating extra
"anyType" field
> This is *quite* undesirable. Does anyone have any suggestions for a
> workaround?
At this point, I think the only options are:
1) Switch to jaxb (which doesn't do this)
2) Start writing the code to do the "flat" stuff. Patches are more
than welcome. :-)
Dan
On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Kaleb Walton wrote:
> Darn! I think that's it... I'm looking at the output of all of my
> arrays and they fork in this extra level which is given the name of
> the class of the object type stored in the array.
>
> Example:
> Note the extra 'ServiceFieldError' level that shouldn't be there and
> also note the 'fieldErrors' property that should actually be of type
> Array.
>
> [fieldErrors] => stdClass Object
> (
> [ServiceFieldError] => Array
> (
> [0] => stdClass Object
> (
> [code] => errors.required
> [defaultMessage] => Field
> is required
> [field] => foo
> [rejectedValue] => Foo
> )
>
> [1] => stdClass Object
> (
> [code] => errors.required
> [defaultMessage] => Field
> is required
> [field] => bar
> [rejectedValue] => 1
> )
>
> )
>
> )
>
> This is *quite* undesirable. Does anyone have any suggestions for a
> workaround?
>
> Regards,
> Kaleb
>
> |------------>
> | From: |
> |------------>
> |
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------------|
> >
> |"Benson Margulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> |
> | |
> |
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------------|
> |
> |------------>
> | To: |
> |------------>
> |
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------------|
> >
> |<cxf-user@incubator.apache.org>
> |
> | |
> |
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------------|
> |
> |------------>
> | Date: |
> |------------>
> |
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------------|
> >
> |11/06/2007 11:49 AM
> |
> | |
> |
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------------|
> |
> |------------>
> | Subject: |
> |------------>
> |
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------------|
> >
> |RE: Aegis databinding and Java 5 Generic List creating extra
> | "anyType" field
> | |
> |
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------
> >------------|
>
> The 'flat' feature is an attribute in the mapping schema that was
> intended to control some cases of either adding an extra level of
> type/element or not. Apparently, it isn't this one. While the code to
> parse the attribute exists, the code to actually pay attention to it
> does not.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Kaleb Walton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 11:27 AM
> To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Aegis databinding and Java 5 Generic List creating extra
> "anyType" field
>
>
>
> Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately nillable is already set to false.
>
> What is the 'flat' feature? I can't imagine that I'm the only person
> having the problem.
>
> Do you know if there is a way to specify something in an aegis.xml
> config that tells the 'items' list to not add the 'anyType' property?
>
> Regards,
> Kaleb
>
> Inactive hide details for "Benson Margulies" ---11/06/2007 08:58:14
> AM---If you set nillable to false it might do what you want"Benson
> Margulies" ---11/06/2007 08:58:14 AM---If you set nillable to false it
> might do what you want. On the other
>
>
> From:
>
>
> "Benson Margulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> To:
>
>
> <cxf-user@incubator.apache.org>
>
>
> Date:
>
>
> 11/06/2007 08:58 AM
>
>
> Subject:
>
>
> RE: Aegis databinding and Java 5 Generic List creating extra "anyType"
> field
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
>
> If you set nillable to false it might do what you want. On the other
> hand, it might be that this is the never-implemented 'flat' feature of
> Aegis.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kaleb Walton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 8:55 AM
> > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Aegis databinding and Java 5 Generic List creating extra
> > "anyType" field
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks to Aegis databinding I can specify the minOccurs on my
>
> primitive
>
> > fields so the WSDL contract doesn't force them to be required.
>
> However,
>
> > Aegis has introduced something else that I'm not familiar with. It
> > may
>
> be
>
> > "proper" but I'm not familiar with it and it seems to add one more
>
> level
>
> > of
> > a property between a field name and it's value.
> >
> > I have an object defined as such:
> >
> > class ServiceListResult<T> {
> > private List<T> items;
> > //getters/setters
> > }
> >
> > T is a Java 5 generic class reference.
> >
> > When using the Simple Server default data binding my object looked
>
> like
>
> > this when output from PHP:
> >
> > [items] => Array
> > (
> > [0] => stdClass Object
> > (
> > ...
> > )
> > )
> >
> > Now it looks like this:
> >
> > [items] => sdtClass Object
> > (
> > [anyType] => Array
> > (
> > [0] => stdClass Object
> > (
> > ...
> > )
> > )
> > )
> >
> >
> > Is there any way to make the output look like the Simple Server did
> > or
>
> is
>
> > this the "proper" output since I'm using generics?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kaleb
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
