I thought you wrote that you were also failing with CXF java2wsdl?

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:17 PM, John-M Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Sorry, "What's your frustration with java-first and CXF"?
>
> John Baker
> --
> Web SSO
> IT Infrastructure
> Deutsche Bank London
>
> URL:  http://websso.cto.gt.intranet.db.com
>
>
>
>
> "Benson Margulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 29/02/2008 17:08
> Please respond to
> cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> To
> cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: WSDLtoJava
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It's wrong in my opinion. HashMap's in JAXB are hard, but they can be
> done.
>
> What's your  frustration with java-first and CXF?
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:06 PM, John-M Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Yep, I agree. Or rather, Axis2's java2wsdl has helpfully put that
> > namespace in the file. The -p option obviously resolved it for me. I
> > assume Axis2 is behaving correctly by generating this WSDL given
> returning
> > a Map must be a fairly common feature, yet 'claiming' that namespace
> seems
> > to be a 'bad thing'?
> >
> >
> > John Baker
> > --
> > Web SSO
> > IT Infrastructure
> > Deutsche Bank London
> >
> > URL:  http://websso.cto.gt.intranet.db.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Benson Margulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 29/02/2008 17:01
> > Please respond to
> > cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
> > To
> > cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > Re: WSDLtoJava
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It is doing what you asked it to do. You've got namespaces like
> >
> >       <xs:schema xmlns:ax22="http://util.java/xsd";
> >
> > in your file. You are claiming control of that package. Either change
> the
> > namespace or remap it to a package of your own.
> >
> > There's nothing wrong with returning hashmaps.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:58 AM, John-M Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, that fixed the problem. I'm returning a java.util.HashMap from
> > one
> > > of the objects - I assume that's where the problem lies? Is this a bad
> > > thing?
> > >
> > > John Baker
> > > --
> > > Web SSO
> > > IT Infrastructure
> > > Deutsche Bank London
> > >
> > > URL:  http://websso.cto.gt.intranet.db.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Daniel Lipofsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 29/02/2008 16:42
> > > Please respond to
> > > cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > > To
> > > <cxf-user@incubator.apache.org>
> > > cc
> > >
> > > Subject
> > > RE: WSDLtoJava
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not sure why it is using that package,
> > > it usually bases the package name off the
> > > namespace URL, but you can override by adding the -p
> > > parameter like this
> > >
> > >            <arg value="-p"/>
> > >            <arg value="com.mycompany.foobar.ws.impl.jaxws"/>
> > >
> > > try that and see if it helps.
> > > - Dan
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: John-M Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 9:20 AM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: WSDLtoJava
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I'm looking for a reliable wsdl2java product and I'm looking
> > > > at CXF. I've
> > > > generated a set of sources from a WSDL but a set of java.util.xsd.*
> > > > sources have been generated. When compiled and run, the VM
> > > > complains that
> > > > java.util is a protected package (because it is).
> > > >
> > > > I'm generating the source using the following ant configuration:
> > > >
> > > >     <java classname="org.apache.cxf.tools.wsdlto.WSDLToJava"
> > > > fork="true">
> > > >        <arg value="-client"/>
> > > >        <arg value="-d"/>
> > > >        <arg value="${dist.dir}/stubs"/>
> > > >        <arg value="${dist.dir}/Query.wsdl"/>
> > > >        <classpath>
> > > >           <path refid="classpath.cxf"/>
> > > >        </classpath>
> > > >     </java>
> > > >
> > > > Can someone give me some guidance on what I may be doing wrong?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged
> > > > information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have
> > > > received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender
> > > > immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying,
> > > > disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is
> > > > strictly forbidden.
> > > >
> > > > Please refer to
> > > > http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for
> > > > additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
> > you
> > > are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
> > > please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any
> > > unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in
> this
> > > e-mail is strictly forbidden.
> > >
> > > Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for
> > > additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> >
> > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
> you
> > are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
> > please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any
> > unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
> > e-mail is strictly forbidden.
> >
> > Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for
> > additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
> >
>
>
>
> ---
>
> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
> are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
> please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any
> unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
> e-mail is strictly forbidden.
>
> Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for
> additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
>

Reply via email to