Antonio: you've changed the words...the rules say "has the" not "has to" Much different. "...has the choice" gives him options, "has to (sic) choise (should be choose)" ,as you are alluding, removes the options.
So he "MUST" NOT divide if he so chooses. Pete --- In [email protected], "banfus2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Mark, > you mentioned rule: > 12.5 When several units attack several defending units > the attacker has the choice of how to divide combat > provided. > How do you interpretate "the attacker has to choise of how to divide"? > I'm from Italy but "has to" means he MUST divide and not he CAN > divide or combine... > Make sense? > > Hi Sir, > I can't found where rule says "it's optional" > Where is it? > > Hi Lee Massey, > I agree with you. Thanks for your reply. > > Hi Michael Gallagher, > please could you give me the address site of BBG? > Have you found anything on your The General > magazine collection? > > Best Regards > Antonio >
