You've changed the phrasing...it is "has the" which is vastly different from "has to"
Reclarify if it is "has the" or "has to". Pete --- banfus2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mark, > you mentioned rule: > 12.5 When several units attack several defending > units > the attacker has the choice of how to divide combat > provided. > How do you interpretate "the attacker has to choise > of how to divide"? > I'm from Italy but "has to" means he MUST divide > and not he CAN > divide or combine... > Make sense? > > Hi Sir, > I can't found where rule says "it's optional" > Where is it? > > Hi Lee Massey, > I agree with you. Thanks for your reply. > > Hi Michael Gallagher, > please could you give me the address site of BBG? > Have you found anything on your The General > magazine collection? > > Best Regards > Antonio > > > > > > > > To change your delivery settings, go to > http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/CyberBoardML. > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
