Thank you NICK for this valuable information.  I have been talking about this 
to others about how vital this is.  We need to make sure everyone also 
understands that their names (the judges) will appear separately on the 
ballot.  I think alot of people think if they vote a straight ticket, they are 
also voting for the judges.  The more people who know  this and the names of 
these judges the better..

--- On Wed, 9/24/08, Ellis, Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: Ellis, Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [COWs] NC judicial elections
To: "John Anthony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Doug Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Lindsey E de Guehery MD" <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2008, 10:40 AM









I'll get calls from time to time about judicial elections since most 
non-lawyers (and many lawyers) don't have a clue about these candidates.  
Personally, I like judges that will construe existing law from the bench rather 
than create new law from the bench.  Below are how these philosophies are 
defined:
 

Black’s Law Dictionary defines “judicial activism” as “Judicial philosophy 
which motivates judges to depart from strict adherence to judicial precedent 
and favor progressive and new social policies which are not always consistent 
with the restraint expected of appellate judges.  It is commonly marked by 
decisions calling for social engineering and occasionally these decisions 
represent intrusions into legislative and executive matters.”  A related term 
defined in Black’s is “judicial self-restraint”, which is  “Self-imposed 
discipline by judges in deciding cases without permitting themselves to indulge 
their own personal views or ideas which may be inconsistent with existing 
decisional or statutory law.”  
I personally know these folks and believe they'll exercise judicial 
self-restraint deciding cases:
NC Supreme Court - Bob Edmunds (running for reelection)
NC Court of Appeals - Linda Stephens (great judge seeking to keep her seat)
                                        Doug McCullough (running for reelection)
 
There are a few other appellate races, but no comment on those.  I encourage 
you to vote for the folks listed above.
 
Nick Ellis
 
 
Nick Ellis 
Poyner & Spruill, LLP 
252-972-7115 (work); 252-452-2127 (cell) 

This electronic communication (including attachments) contains attorney 
privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the named 
recipient.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from 
disseminating, distributing or copying this communication.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return 
message or by telephone at 919.783.6400 and delete this communication from your 
system.  Thank you.

 








***********
This electronic communication (including attachments) may contain attorney 
privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the named 
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, you are prohibited from 
disseminating, distributing or copying this communication. If you have received 
this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return message or 
by telephone at 919.783.6400 and delete this communication from your system. 
Thank you.
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, unless specifically 
indicated otherwise, any tax advice contained in this communication (including 
any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, 
for the purpose of avoiding tax related penalties or promoting, marketing or 
recommending to another party any tax related matter addressed herein.
***********


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CyclistsOfWilson-COWs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/CyclistsOfWilson-COWs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to