Pavel Tsekov wrote: > On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Max Bowsher wrote: > >>> Btw, please, do not update the cygwin specific part of the package >>> version number when releasing an updated version in the process of >>> reviewing. >> >> Didn't the last discussion on this agree on *DO* update the >> Cygwin-specific release number during reviewing? > > Please, consult the last discussion about that.
My memory is incorrect. Sorry. I do think that a version number should uniquely identify a version, though. A possibility that was not considered last time this was discussed is to start the reviewing at -0.1, going -0.2, -0.3, etc., and then bump to -1 on release. Feel free to ignore me if you don't want to reopen this discussion. Max.