On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Dean Scarff wrote: > > Ok, I've just reviewed the package. Do you mind moving the contents of > > /usr/doc/nasm to /usr/doc/nasm-0.98.35 ? > > > > Btw, please, do not update the cygwin specific part of the package > > version number when releasing an updated version in the process of > > reviewing. > > > > My mistake, both the above points are fixed now. The new binary package looks like:
Should I upload this package ? The missing pdf is not a big deal IMO since the package provides both info and html docs.