At 06:02 PM 1/25/2003, Max Bowsher wrote: >Charles Wilson wrote: > > Robert Collins wrote: > >> > >> I second this. In fact, IMO this vote should really be a formality - > >> this is core infrastructure after all. > > > > "pro" from me. Actually, rebase probably should be in the 'Base' > > category, IMO. > >What exactly are the criteria for "Base"? > >Whilst we are talking about it, I think "ncurses" might no longer need to be >"Base", now there is "libncurses?". > >Since rebasing is not necessary in many circumstances, should rebase be >"Base"? It seems unnecessary to force it to be installed, especially as it >is so easy to install packages when you need them.
Are we planning to flag DLLs that require invoking rebase when installed via setup? If so, then I agree with Max's statement. Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX