On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 08:53:09AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 08:45, Ralf Habacker wrote: >> > > Should this rebase maybe be a Cygwin, not MinGW version? >> > > (So that we can use POSIX paths with it?) >> > >> > No - you need to be able to rebase cygwin1.dll too. >> >> As far as I know is the cygwin1.dll not designed to be rebased. > >There was a long thread on the devel list about this. Cygwin1.dll needs >to be at the same base address in every process. But that address can be >anything.
Correct! If things aren't working that way then that's a bug. cgf
