> Robert Collins wrote: > > On Sat, 2003-04-05 at 19:23, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > >> 2003-04-05 Gary R. Van Sickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> * RECTPP.h: New file. > > > > Much better. A few remaining nits. > > > > a) The class name, as discussed before. > > b) RECTCC_H__F4098557_9A48_446d_AF28_2BE45D29F68D__INCLUDED_ > > Uhm, thats plain ugly.
It's a GUID, it's supposed to by ugly. Guaranteed to be unique, not going to collide with anything ever. That's how MS's "AppWizard" does it, and it seems like a good idea to me. Please Rob, if you're going to pick nits, pick on something that could possibly matter. For me? Please? > > c) (optional) It might be an idea to mention that no virtual methods are > > permitted in the class, and that no additional parents are allowed, as > > either would break binary interchangeability with the MS RECT class. > > Given that it is derived from RECT, I think RECTPP is a good name. I concur. -- Gary R. Van Sickle Brewer. Patriot.
