On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 01:46, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > It's a GUID, it's supposed to by ugly. Guaranteed to be unique, not going to > collide with anything ever. That's how MS's "AppWizard" does it, and it seems > like a good idea to me. Please Rob, if you're going to pick nits, pick on > something that could possibly matter. For me? Please?
Sure. And this matters. If you don't change it before submitting, I'll have to change it afterwards. Why should I add to my workload when a simple request here should get it right the first time. This matters. SETUP_<FILENAME>_H is the preferred way. (We're not a library, so the namespace is ours). > > > c) (optional) It might be an idea to mention that no virtual methods are > > > permitted in the class, and that no additional parents are allowed, as > > > either would break binary interchangeability with the MS RECT class. > > > > Given that it is derived from RECT, I think RECTPP is a good name. > > I concur. I've addressed this already, and in my reply to Max. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part