> On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 11:32, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > > Hmmm, yeah, I'll look at this. I wonder why I don't get this and (I assume) > > others don't.... > > Incorrect const clause on wantsActivation in the base class lead to > inconsistent method signatures.
I don't understand. In proppage.{h,cc} (the base class) and in any overrides (i.e. root and AntiVirus) both I and CVS have: virtual bool wantsActivation() const [etc...] which is the correct signature. The const is not incorrect; it's not logical that asking an object whether it wants to be activated or not would change the object's state. Or am I completely misunderstanding you? > I fixed this this morning, but have been > rushed - so no announcement. This affected the display of the 'root' > dialog too. > > However, there is a new setup.exe as of ~10 hours ago. > FWIW, I was not able to reproduce the problem with my latest build. -- Gary R. Van Sickle