On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 08:52:42AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > I hope what I said below didn't come out as "I will take over > maintainership". Not really: I think the ``I don't have "a month worth of developers time". :-)'' was pretty clear that you didn't intend to take over maintainership :) Just wanted to make sure, though :)
> I may be able to commit a few patches (since I have access already), but I > doubt I'll have much time for extensive testing or reviewing of others' > patches. It would make me much more comfortable if someone else served as > a buffer between me and the raw CVS, and at least reviewed and approved my > (and others') patches. As the generic build script is pretty wide-spread I definitely understand that :) > If you wish, we could do it the way Pierre, Thomas, and others with commit > access deal with the winsup repository: they can commit, but their patches > have to be approved by either CGF or Corinna first. If you want to serve > as an approver (maintainer) and double-check my decisions, I can take care > of committing the patches. Good idea - I'll be happy to check the different patches and it doesn't require me to have commit access :) Once again, though: the "month of developer's time" doesn't start for another three weeks. Before that, I won't be able to do much of anything as far as Cygwin is concerned.. [snipped previous discussion] rlc