On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:02:50PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > I was going to reply to Chuck's original message, but here goes: > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:38:50PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > > > Here are the patches I have/had on my 'pending' list for the > > > generic-build-script. Thanks for (permanently or even just temporarily) > > > handling these maintainance duties, Igor... > > > > > > Some of these messages spawned threads and updated patches; be sure to > > > read all replies. > > > > > Alan Miles: "Diff for generic readme and generic-build script" > > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-11/msg00700.html > > > > > > Alan Miles: "Diff for generic readme and generic-build script to > > > automatically generate pkg data and file listings" > > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-11/msg01067.html > > These two are the same... > They aren't, but the final patches in all of the resulting threads are. That's what I meant - sorry for the confusion..
> > > Alan Miles: "Patch for generic readme and generic-build script to > > > automatically generate pkg data and file listings" > > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-01/msg00042.html > > AFAICS, this one is the same as well.. > I've been looking at the above patch (all 3 copies). > > > > Harold Hunt: "Patch to generic-build-script for listing package files" > > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-10/msg00351.html > > AFAICT, the patch above includes this functionality (but this is a nice > > alternate method, perhaps... > This one's already in. The ChangeLog could use updating, though -- it > only reflects two early changes. I'll take care of that. OK. > > > Lapo Luchini: patch to generic-build-script (updated to cvs 1.4) > > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-08/msg00323.html > > This one looks interesting though very, well.., paranoid ;) > I agree with the spaces at ends of lines sentiment. I'm working on a > cleanup pass (formatting and spacing) now. Hmm.. I guess you both are a bit more paranoid than I am :) > > > Lapo Luchini: patch to generic-build-script > > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-06/msg00273.html > > Look pretty much like the previous one.. > Yes, it does. > > > I'll have a "really close" look at the two non-duplicates. > > rlc > > Ronald, if you could please split this last patch into the > whitespace/formatting part and the contributions part, it would make it > much easier to commit. I'll keep looking at the first one for now (after > I'm done with the whitespace changes). Due to my lack of paranoia, that's more or less what I'm doing: I was planning to simply get rid of the paranoid stuff and split the patch into functional chunks (tarname diffs as one chunk, etc.). The first patch looks nice, but I haven't gotten around to testing it thouroughly yet. I'll do that tomorow morning (note the timezone difference: that would be at about midnight chez toi). Again, the month hasn't started yet - I'm working during coffee and lunch breaks. rlc