On Apr 1 15:18, Mark Blackburn wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Apr 1 10:39, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > > >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >>Hash: SHA1 > >> > >>Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >>| The latest on coreutils is that it's still not ready to go mainstream > >>| (<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00150.html>). > >>What is the current status on this? I still have it in my ITP queue and > >>my Bugzilla is starting to whine about it, but if there's another ITP > >>that is ready to go mainstream, I'll be happy to kick it out of my queue > >>and be done with it ;) > >> > >>If there's no progress, I'll use the little time I have a Windows > >>computer next to me on my desk to work on coreutils rather than example > >>programs for Cygwin-docs (should have a Windows box this afternoon). > > > > > >Ask Mark what's the problem. He was already as far as removing > >su, kill and uptime from the binary package but then... > > > > > >Corinna > > > > I was trying to get make check to finish completely but it looks like it > will take more time than it's worth. One problem it has is with the present > version of cygwin (1.5.9) recursive commands don't work (ie chgrp -R). That
Huh? What should be the reason for this? The recursive commands from fileutils are runnning fine under 1.5.9. And I have a local build of coreutils which also doesn't have problems under 1.5.9. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.