On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Schulman.Andrew wrote: > > I have done a Cygwin package of LablGtk now, just add the Cygwin > > specific README and sign it with your name, if there are no objections > > it will be included in the netrelease and unison-gtk2 is GTG, once we > > found the reason why I needed to apply the beloow changes. Fetch the > > LablGtk package here: http://194.95.224.180/lablgtk/ > > I decided to go ahead and build a lablgtk2 package myself, so I can > reasonably maintain it in the future. > > I've built the package, but now I have a problem: if I strip > /usr/lib/ocaml/lablgtk2/lablgtktop.exe, then when I run > /usr/bin/lablgtk2, I get "Unknown option -w": > > $ lablgtk2 -verbose > /usr/lib/ocaml/lablgtk2/lablgtktop -w s -I /usr/local/stow/lablgtk-2.4.0 > /usr/lib/ocaml/lablgtk2 -I gtkInit.cmo > Unknown option -w. > > If I don't strip lablgtktop.exe, then I don't get this error. I can't > find any documentation about what the '-w s' option does, but I believe > it's supposed to be passed on to the OCaml compiler. > > Questions: should I just give up on stripping the executable? Or is > there a workaround? Do I need the -w option at all? Sorry, but I know > almost nothing about OCaml or LablGTK.
Yes, don't strip ocaml executables -- they have embedded bytecode, and stripping screws them up (as I've learned the hard way). Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! "Happiness lies in being privileged to work hard for long hours in doing whatever you think is worth doing." -- Dr. Jubal Harshaw