-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lapo Luchini wrote: > Yes, I guess Debian unstable doesn't qualify (I think I read something > about that somewhere on cygwin.com, I'm not quite sure where... ;-)).
But (now) it's in Debian testing as well: http://packages.debian.org/testing/utils/bsdiff > Uhm.. does Gentoo count as "major"? > In that case... http://gentoo-portage.com/dev-util/bsdiff I haven't seen a clear answer about that, but the feeling that I've been getting is not. I'd like to get this clarified though. Yaakov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD2nXvpiWmPGlmQSMRAhHSAKC9aEeiGxYyngVIje0Kt+TN2L7dqwCg/k0v Lahu/FDASslndCNa+vcfKV8= =f3P+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----