-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Lapo Luchini wrote:
> Yes, I guess Debian unstable doesn't qualify (I think I read something
> about that somewhere on cygwin.com, I'm not quite sure where... ;-)).

But (now) it's in Debian testing as well:

http://packages.debian.org/testing/utils/bsdiff

> Uhm.. does Gentoo count as "major"?
> In that case... http://gentoo-portage.com/dev-util/bsdiff

I haven't seen a clear answer about that, but the feeling that I've been
getting is not.  I'd like to get this clarified though.


Yaakov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD2nXvpiWmPGlmQSMRAhHSAKC9aEeiGxYyngVIje0Kt+TN2L7dqwCg/k0v
Lahu/FDASslndCNa+vcfKV8=
=f3P+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to