On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:56:17PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >Apparently there is a bug in this version of unionfs, though. If you >try to recreate a missing file by just copying it in or touching it you >get a "File exists" error and that's not right. You aren't supposed to >have to know that there is something special going on and a mysterious >error like that sort of breaks that assumption.
Please hold off making any changes to anything in the release-2 area. I want to try another unionfs implementation which doesn't seem to have this problem. cgf
