On 10/7/2008 7:43 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 6 08:13, David Rothenberger wrote:
On 10/6/2008 1:09 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 29 18:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 15 08:25, David Rothenberger wrote:
Ping.
Is there anything else I need to do for this package before it is
uploaded?
If nobody else is looking into these packages, I'll do it later this
week.
I didn't forget and I still have this on my plate. I'm still not quite
back to normal, sorry.
No problem. I understand that it can take a while to get back to normal
after a holiday.
Holiday + Sickness = :( Only the holiday is over, though.
Sorry to hear that. I hope you feel better soon.
I had a quick look and the basic packaging looks ok. What bugs me
a bit is the new layout.
Old:
apr1 --- libapr1
New:
libapr1 -+- apr1
+- libapr1-devel
I guess we should better move the apr1 dir into the _obsolete dir, then
just leave the libapr1 dir at top level:
_obsolete --- apr1
libapr1 --- libapr1-devel
Same for the aprutil1/libaprutil1 dirs. Is that what you intended?
I hadn't thought about the directory layout, but I think that will work.
apr1 and aprutil1 are both empty transition packages that are marked
obsolete, so they can (should?) go under _obsolete I guess.
Do you want me to restructure the packages on my server to match this
layout?
--
David Rothenberger ---- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steinbach's Guideline for Systems Programming:
Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle.