Dave Korn wrote: >> BTW: this was compiled with gcc-3.4.4-999, should I reroll it with >> gcc4-4.3.2-2? > > Well... given that nothing's using it yet, and it's for 1.7, why not save > the hassle of an ABI break later?
Mhh... unfortunately that seems to break it. (the test-suite executable just dies with error 128) Also, the configure script doesn't accept overriding CXX, so I used "alternatives" to change my default. Is there any problem in that approach? Also, trying strace on it fails with "The procedure entry point __Unwind_Resume could not be located in the dynamic link library cygwin1.dll" (I guess strace wasn't yet ported to cygwin-1.7?). -- Lapo Luchini - http://lapo.it/ “When two trains approach each other at a crossing, both shall come to a full stop and neither shall start up again until the other has gone.” (Kansas State Legislature)