On Jun 4 01:07, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:16:21PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > >On 6/3/2010 5:39 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> > >> Does anybody > >> have a problem with that? If so, would you take over maintainership > >> for pine? > > > >Aren't all the cool kids using alpine now instead? > > That's what I hear. Also, from my very limited reading, it sounds like > the pine license is now (retroactively?) incompatible with Cygwin now so > pine probably should no longer be in the distribution.
Ok, I removed pine. As I just found out, the openssl097 package never made it into the 1.7 release area, so pine was disfunctional anyway. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat