Hi Yaakov, On Jun 22 23:53, Yaakov S wrote: > On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 09:56 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Jun 20 22:35, Yaakov S wrote: > > > To avoid these problems in the future (and openssl 1.0.0 is coming soon, > > > I presume, so this will be an issue fairly soon), may I suggest the > > > current DLLs from openssl be packaged separately as libssl0.9.8? > > > > That was the plan anyway as soon as I get around to move to openssl-1.0.0 > > myself. > > > > I assume you mean "asap"? Including to change the package dependencies > > throughout? > > Yes, I mean ASAP for 0.9.8, and a separate libssl1.0.0 (or however the > DLLs will be versioned) with the first 1.0.0 release.
Can you please have a look if that's ok? wget -nH -r \ http://www.vinschen.de/openssl/libopenssl098/libopenssl098-0.9.8o-2.tar.bz2 \ http://www.vinschen.de/openssl/libopenssl098/setup.hint \ http://www.vinschen.de/openssl/openssl-0.9.8o-2-src.tar.bz2 \ http://www.vinschen.de/openssl/openssl-0.9.8o-2.tar.bz2 \ http://www.vinschen.de/openssl/openssl-devel/setup.hint \ http://www.vinschen.de/openssl/openssl-devel/openssl-devel-0.9.8o-2.tar.bz2 \ http://www.vinschen.de/openssl/setup.hint Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat