On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:34:03PM +0100, David Sastre wrote: >On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:07:13PM +0100, Jorge D?az wrote: >> 2011/1/10 David Sastre <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX!!!!!!>: <===!!? >> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:12:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> On Jan ?9 12:58, David Sastre wrote: >> >> > On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:54:26AM +0100, Jorge D?az wrote: >> >> > > Can you try installing recent Cygwin snapshot >> >> > > Can you try launching only failed test r00326.vtc?? >> >> > > Can you send me your IPv6 error log? >> >> > >> >> > CYGWIN_NT-6.1 win7 1.7.8s(0.234/5/3) 20101229 01:34:45 i686 Cygwin >> >> > >> >> > I have used a modified version of c00005.vtc to test IPv6 in >> >> > 2.1.4-4 and 2.1.2-4. >> >> > >> >> > All tests have run successfully. >> >> >> >> David, is that a GTG? ?If so, I'd upload the files... >> > >> > I'm waiting for Jorge to pack a version correcting the absence of >> > setup.hint and a README in varnish-${version}.cygwin.patch. >> > >> > My apologies to both. I wasn't clear about that. >> > >> I am working on it. >> >> I have added "setup.hint and README" files and also made two minor changes. >> I think it will be finished today. > >Please http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU >and ?http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR > >OK. Please bump the cygwin package release number when you do that. > >Thanks for the quick response!
Why bump the package release on something that has never been released? I think it makes sense that the first release should be -1. cgf