On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 07:57:23PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:34:03PM +0100, David Sastre wrote: > >OK. Please bump the cygwin package release number when you do that. > Why bump the package release on something that has never been released? > I think it makes sense that the first release should be -1.
That's what I understand from: 2. Do increase the version number no matter what (if upstream version didn't change, bump the Cygwin release number): even if the package was bad, even if it was removed from the server for a security issue, even if has only been discussed in mailing list and never uploaded: it costs nothing and avoids confusion in both setup.exe and people mind. in http://cygwin.com/setup.html It makes sense to me regardless it is a first release or an update. Is it a wrong assumption? -- Huella de clave primaria: 0FDA C36F F110 54F4 D42B D0EB 617D 396C 448B 31EB
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
