On 12/03/2013 22:15, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>> Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes:
>> OK.  I won't be able to run the tests for some packages this way, but it
>> sounds like this should provide a workable solution for bootstrapping.
>> I guess we will anyway have to re-compile all packages with gcc47 when
>> it is ready for release, right?
> 
> Fascinatingly the tests for libmpc do run, although ldd gets confused
> about what libraries it depends on and stops midway after outputting a
> dependence on ?????.
> 
> If the second gcc47 test release is made within this week I'd prefer
> that to roll the packages, otherwise I'll set up a second installation
> with the current release.  I'll put all packages for the gcc47 branch
> into [test], like gcc itself, is that correct?

  I haven't yet had an explicit go-ahead for that -2 release, but I've been
rerolling it with the mpfr (shared libgcc) fix in order to be ready.  Gonna
check the same fix into upstream trunk tonight as well.

    cheers,
      DaveK

Reply via email to