On 12/03/2013 22:15, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
>> Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes:
>> OK. I won't be able to run the tests for some packages this way, but it
>> sounds like this should provide a workable solution for bootstrapping.
>> I guess we will anyway have to re-compile all packages with gcc47 when
>> it is ready for release, right?
>
> Fascinatingly the tests for libmpc do run, although ldd gets confused
> about what libraries it depends on and stops midway after outputting a
> dependence on ?????.
>
> If the second gcc47 test release is made within this week I'd prefer
> that to roll the packages, otherwise I'll set up a second installation
> with the current release. I'll put all packages for the gcc47 branch
> into [test], like gcc itself, is that correct?
I haven't yet had an explicit go-ahead for that -2 release, but I've been
rerolling it with the mpfr (shared libgcc) fix in order to be ready. Gonna
check the same fix into upstream trunk tonight as well.
cheers,
DaveK
