Hi Dave, On Mar 12 23:50, Dave Korn wrote: > On 12/03/2013 22:15, Achim Gratz wrote: > > Achim Gratz writes: > >> Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes: > >> OK. I won't be able to run the tests for some packages this way, but it > >> sounds like this should provide a workable solution for bootstrapping. > >> I guess we will anyway have to re-compile all packages with gcc47 when > >> it is ready for release, right? > > > > Fascinatingly the tests for libmpc do run, although ldd gets confused > > about what libraries it depends on and stops midway after outputting a > > dependence on ?????. > > > > If the second gcc47 test release is made within this week I'd prefer > > that to roll the packages, otherwise I'll set up a second installation > > with the current release. I'll put all packages for the gcc47 branch > > into [test], like gcc itself, is that correct? > > I haven't yet had an explicit go-ahead for that -2 release, but I've been > rerolling it with the mpfr (shared libgcc) fix in order to be ready. Gonna > check the same fix into upstream trunk tonight as well.
How's the state of affairs? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat