On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 02:01:05PM -0800, Earnie Boyd wrote: >--- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Right. I would welcome a texinfo update but, if anything it should use >> -mno-win32 as an option to avoid Win32'isms. >> > >This is the reason I modified my specs file to remove those definitions. IMHO, >reversing -mno-win32 to -mwin32 is best. Unfortunately, I think it is too late for this now. I think it will cause immense confusion and breakage if we do this. cgf
- Texinfo-4.0 Carlos Puig
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Charles Wilson
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Christopher Faylor
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Earnie Boyd
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Christopher Faylor
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Earnie Boyd
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Christopher Faylor
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Earnie Boyd
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Christopher Faylor
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Carlos Puig
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Charles Wilson
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Charles Wilson
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Christopher Faylor
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Earnie Boyd
- Re: Texinfo-4.0 Christopher Faylor