On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:44:38AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:45 AM >Subject: Re: Apps maintainer -- do you want your name/email address in a >public place > > >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 06:33:24PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >> >Lapo Luchini wrote: >> >> >> >> > Maintainer: Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >> >> That's quite a good idea! >> >> "contact me, but please contact me there"... nice message =) >> >> I agree on (this form of) "non-public". >> > >> >Yeah, this is okay. But should it be cygwin-apps? >> >> Dunno. cygwin-apps wasn't really intended for bug reports but we >> could always change that. > >I was thinking of setup itself... for other packages [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc may be appropriate - ie for >squid I would put >Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >If we are just going to push everything via [EMAIL PROTECTED], I see no >point having a 'email' field.
I guess it would be up to the package maintainer to suggest what the appropriate mail address would be. I'm not sure that I'd be happy seeing cygwin users cropping up in [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, I think that in the majority of cases cygwin@cygwin is the correct place to post bugs. It's like in the gcc mailing list when someone reports a problem with gcc 2.96.47 from Red Hat 7.2. The response is always "Talk to Red Hat". cgf
