----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >If we are just going to push everything via [EMAIL PROTECTED], I see no > >point having a 'email' field. > > I guess it would be up to the package maintainer to suggest what the > appropriate mail address would be. I'm not sure that I'd be happy > seeing cygwin users cropping up in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the package maintainer _and_ the package vendor need to agree and set this. If the vendor isn't consulted, then [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the happy default. > However, I think that in the majority of cases cygwin@cygwin is the > correct place to post bugs. It's like in the gcc mailing list when > someone reports a problem with gcc 2.96.47 from Red Hat 7.2. The > response is always "Talk to Red Hat". Agreed.