Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>>>2) can anybody come up with a better name? This package is intended to >>>>be a grab-bag of simple utilities (each executable requires only a >>>>single source code file of moderate length). > > Then maybe 'cygutils' would be a good name? Urk...but I already used that name for my "world-famous" website. <g> Wouldn't that lead to confusion? Or would it actually be LESS confusing for folks since 'cygutils' == me == the misc package (well, mostly)? > BTW, I want this package, I'm using 'dos2unix' a lot. That's three! Cool! (But I still need to wait a few days in case the all-powerful veto appears...) --Chuck
