Charles Wilson wrote: > > Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > > >>>>2) can anybody come up with a better name? This package is intended to > >>>>be a grab-bag of simple utilities (each executable requires only a > >>>>single source code file of moderate length). > > > > > Then maybe 'cygutils' would be a good name? > > Urk...but I already used that name for my "world-famous" website. <g> > Wouldn't that lead to confusion? Or would it actually be LESS confusing > for folks since 'cygutils' == me == the misc package (well, mostly)?
What about cygwin-helpers or cyghelpers ?