----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 20:25 Subject: Re: [PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 3:14 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH]Reduce messages in setup.log > > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:00:36PM -0800, Michael A Chase wrote: > > > > I don't know how Robert prefers this, but it is customary to provide a > > single patch file not a bunch of separate attachments. With one patch > > file you can just say > > Yes please, one patch is nicer. Sorry. I got confused and thought it was the other way around. What about the compress_gz.error() and compress_bz.error() messages. The gz one is commented out and the bz one isn't. Should they be the same? If so, which is preferred? I lean toward writing both as long as they are going to setup.log.full. -- Mac :}) ** I normally forward private questions to the appropriate mail list. ** Ask Smarter: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.htm Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a day. Give a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.