=== ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > for a > > quick-and-dirtyish String class. Sigh, still no STL. > > Rob, would you care to just graft more functionality onto my embryonic > "cistring" class? Or was that the plan? I left it to the side for now, but yes I do think they should merge. Rob