===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> > for a
> > quick-and-dirtyish String class. Sigh, still no STL.
>
> Rob, would you care to just graft more functionality onto my embryonic
> "cistring" class?  Or was that the plan?

I left it to the side for now, but yes I do think they should merge.

Rob

Reply via email to