On Oct 22 08:00, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:29:13AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Oct 22 00:09, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >Yeah, since the changes to the configury separate Cygwin from mingw and > >w32api, staying in src/winsup is no problem at all. I always thought > >mingw is part of the src tree for gcc bootstrap reasons. > > winsup is not part of the gcc source tree in SVN. So, if it is > necessary for bootstrapping it must have to be pulled in separately > anyway. > > And, if we're talking about moving cygwin entirely to w64api then I > don't see how it could be part of the gcc bootstrap.
I meant bootstrap of a mingw toolchain. I don't know. I just thought this was the original reason. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
